<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wealth Tax · Tax for Bitcoiners — Crypto-asset taxation in Spain</title><link>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/taxes/wealth-tax/</link><description>Recent content in Wealth Tax on Tax for Bitcoiners — Crypto-asset taxation in Spain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/taxes/wealth-tax/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Regularising inherited or gifted bitcoin: limitation and asset surfacing</title><link>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/regularising-inherited-bitcoin/</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/regularising-inherited-bitcoin/</guid><description>Discovering or recovering bitcoin inherited or gifted years ago and wanting to surface it is not resolved with a simple sale. Before monetising, the documentary chain of origin must be reconstructed: acquisition title, limitation, date and acquisition value. Limitation of the Inheritance and Gift Tax (ISD) may reduce the charge to zero, but it does not replace the file that supports the legitimacy of the assets before banks, exchanges and a future sale.</description></item><item><title>Crypto-assets in Wealth Tax and the Solidarity Tax on Large Fortunes</title><link>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/crypto-wealth-tax-spain/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/crypto-wealth-tax-spain/</guid><description>The DGT has a clear valuation criterion: crypto-assets are declared in Wealth Tax (IP) at their market value as at 31 December. What can no longer be analysed in isolation is the effect of the regional rebate, because while the Solidarity Tax on Large Fortunes (ITSGF) remains in force the calculation must be done jointly. The IP–IRPF cap and the family-business exemption call for precision, not slogans.</description></item><item><title>Holding crypto-assets through a company: IS, related-party transactions and interposition</title><link>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/holding-crypto-through-a-company/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/holding-crypto-through-a-company/</guid><description>The comparison between paying tax through IRPF or through a company cannot stop at the headline rate: the real question is whether the income is reinvested or extracted, because extraction carries a later toll. Buying and selling cryptocurrencies for oneself does not constitute an economic activity for the Tax on Economic Activities (IAE) (V1543-25), which is worth bearing in mind so as not to overstate the business solidity of a holding company. Related-party transactions and the substance of the structure are the real focus of risk.</description></item><item><title>Inheritance and gift of crypto-assets: tax and access planning</title><link>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/crypto-inheritance-gift-tax/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/crypto-inheritance-gift-tax/</guid><description>Inheriting bitcoin has two planes that are almost never thought of together. The tax plane: the latent gain is extinguished on death (Article 33.3.b LIRPF), the valuation in Inheritance Tax fixes the heir’s acquisition base (Article 36 LIRPF) and the deceased’s autonomous community decides how much is paid. And the technical plane: without a plan to access the keys, the heir inherits a right they cannot exercise. This guide integrates both.</description></item><item><title>Non-residents with crypto-assets and their connection to Spain</title><link>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/non-residents-crypto-spain/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://taxforbitcoiners.com/en/non-residents-crypto-spain/</guid><description>Taxing a non-resident who holds crypto-assets calls for avoiding knee-jerk assumptions. The first question is not whether there is an exchange or custodian connected to Spain, but whether the specific income can be characterised as obtained in Spanish territory under the Non-Resident Income Tax (IRNR) and the applicable treaty. The useful doctrine on location combines an IRNR ruling of its own (V1069-19) with those of the impatriate regime, and must be applied to non-residents with caution.</description></item></channel></rss>